Limecat - You Should Sanction Mack05

[Duff Paddy]

His signature is clearly in breech of the forum policy regarding personal abuse.

He's fat, he's a tw@t, a total bloody prat..Malahide..Malahide

Why do we entertain half-witted simpletons on this site? Get rid of him. He contributes nothing to the forum except abuse and negativity.

[sarah_lennon]

His signature is clearly in breech of the forum policy regarding personal abuse.

He's fat, he's a tw@t, a total bloody prat..Malahide..Malahide

Why do we entertain half-witted simpletons on this site? Get rid of him. He contributes nothing to the forum except abuse and negativity.

Even though some might agree with the sentiment it is abusive language!

[RobbieRockBoy]

His signature is clearly in breech of the forum policy regarding personal abuse.

He's fat, he's a tw@t, a total bloody prat..Malahide..Malahide

Why do we entertain half-witted simpletons on this site? Get rid of him. He contributes nothing to the forum except abuse and negativity.

well it is a counterfoil to the self-praise and narcissim..

[Duff Paddy]

His signature is clearly in breech of the forum policy regarding personal abuse.

He's fat, he's a tw@t, a total bloody prat..Malahide..Malahide

Why do we entertain half-witted simpletons on this site? Get rid of him. He contributes nothing to the forum except abuse and negativity.

Even though some might agree with the sentiment it is abusive language!

Sarah mullet is a good mate of mine and he doesn't have to put up with abuse from this guy, or you for that matter.

[Duff Paddy]

His signature is clearly in breech of the forum policy regarding personal abuse.

He's fat, he's a tw@t, a total bloody prat..Malahide..Malahide

Why do we entertain half-witted simpletons on this site? Get rid of him. He contributes nothing to the forum except abuse and negativity.

well it is a counterfoil to the self-praise and narcissim..

You can criticise Leinster all you like Robbie, but that signature is clearly in breech of the forum policy on personal abuse.

[sarah_lennon]

His signature is clearly in breech of the forum policy regarding personal abuse.
Why do we entertain half-witted simpletons on this site? Get rid of him. He contributes nothing to the forum except abuse and negativity.

Even though some might agree with the sentiment it is abusive language!

Sarah mullet is a good mate of mine and he doesn't have to put up with abuse from this guy, or you for that matter.

Take a step back! Who abused him? Me? Get a grip I was supporting you!

[ckav]

His signature is clearly in breech of the forum policy regarding personal abuse.

He's fat, he's a tw@t, a total bloody prat..Malahide..Malahide

Why do we entertain half-witted simpletons on this site? Get rid of him. He contributes nothing to the forum except abuse and negativity.

well it is a counterfoil to the self-praise and narcissim..

No, it's not. It's abusive and offensive and we don't want it here, thanks very much. It's unacceptable.

Get rid of the signature.

[Uncle Mort]

It may be that a period of LC flexing his muscles is what is required just to calm things down a bit. A light touch works well most of the time but occasionally a period of heavy handedness just reminds people that this is not a free for all.

[limecat]

It may be that a period of LC flexing his muscles is what is required just to calm things down a bit. A light touch works well most of the time but occasionally a period of heavy handedness just reminds people that this is not a free for all.

I thought that things had been going quite well lately. Then again, I hadn't been on the board as much as I've been extra busy in work

I removed the avatar.

[Uncle Mort]

It may be that a period of LC flexing his muscles is what is required just to calm things down a bit. A light touch works well most of the time but occasionally a period of heavy handedness just reminds people that this is not a free for all.

I thought that things had been going quite well lately. Then again, I hadn't been on the board as much as I've been extra busy in work

I removed the avatar.

As I say generally it does work very well but every now and then there's the odd comment that pushes the boundary - I seem to remember reading something along the lines of "Go f~[€ yourself pondlife" recently which I would question as being acceptable. I don't see how it can be contended that it fits in as reasoned arguement or debate.