Rugby Pet-Hates

Forum for the discussion of other Teams and Clubs as well as General Rugby chat.

Moderator: moderators

User avatar
cormac
Rob Kearney
Posts: 7766
Joined: May 24th, 2006, 2:05 pm
Location: The Moon

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by cormac »

cormac wrote: September 24th, 2022, 10:41 am
Dave Cahill wrote: September 23rd, 2022, 6:20 pm Hugh Cahill. Not in my name
He seems to have disappeared from the airwaves for the last couple of months.
Spoke too soon. :(
Look out Itchy, he's Irish
User avatar
nc6000
Mullet
Posts: 1987
Joined: June 25th, 2007, 8:17 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by nc6000 »

The constant need some commentators have to refer to a player's height and weight etc. Yeah, we know they're big. It's rugby!
Made Of Ale
Graduate
Posts: 615
Joined: November 7th, 2007, 3:32 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by Made Of Ale »

Penalty advantages. Specific complaint is that not scoring a try nearly always equals 'no advantage'.

In my opinion:
  • If you make a decent territory gain (20m or so), advantage should be over.
  • If the ball gets over the try line, and you have a legitimate chance of scoring (e.g. from a cross kick), advantage should be over.
  • The advantage should be time limited (1 minute?), at which point it should be advantage over or come back for the penalty.
Also, the advantage takes no account of how likely a team is to score a try from any play. If you haven't scored a try all match, why should it be 'no advantage' if you don't score while on pen advantage in the 80th minute?

The current interpretations cause overlong advantages and repeated penalty cycles that are biased against the defending team. Leinster make the most of this, but I'm still fed up of it TBH.
User avatar
Oldschool
Cian Healy
Posts: 14510
Joined: March 27th, 2008, 1:10 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by Oldschool »

Extra players joining the original maul.
It's dangerous.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
User avatar
Dave Cahill
Devin Toner
Posts: 25499
Joined: January 24th, 2006, 3:32 pm
Location: None of your damn business
Contact:

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by Dave Cahill »

There was a situation around the Sam Costelow yellow card in the Scarlets vs Ulster game that World Rugby needs to take a look at. The facts of the incident, as outlined by the Referee in his process with the TMO, were that blue(ulster) 14 - Sexton- was in the air attempting to reclaim a high kick, Red 10 - Costelow - went to air, also in an attempt to win the ball, but was not in a realistic position to do so. He collided with Sexton in the air causing Sexton to land on his back. An almost textbook yellow card - and this was awarded.

What the process didn't and doesn't take into account is what happened to Sexton when he landed. The force of his landing upon his back caused a 'whiplash' effect on Sexton's head and neck. This is something that is not accounted for in the process but needs to be.

Sexton was unable to continue and had to be replaced.
I have Bumbleflex
User avatar
LeRouxIsPHat
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15008
Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 7:49 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by LeRouxIsPHat »

Made Of Ale wrote: September 24th, 2022, 7:55 pm Penalty advantages. Specific complaint is that not scoring a try nearly always equals 'no advantage'.

In my opinion:
  • If you make a decent territory gain (20m or so), advantage should be over.
  • If the ball gets over the try line, and you have a legitimate chance of scoring (e.g. from a cross kick), advantage should be over.
  • The advantage should be time limited (1 minute?), at which point it should be advantage over or come back for the penalty.
Also, the advantage takes no account of how likely a team is to score a try from any play. If you haven't scored a try all match, why should it be 'no advantage' if you don't score while on pen advantage in the 80th minute?

The current interpretations cause overlong advantages and repeated penalty cycles that are biased against the defending team. Leinster make the most of this, but I'm still fed up of it TBH.
I broadly agree that they can be far too long but I think it’s a tricky one. It annoys me when there’s a long advantage for a minor offside in the middle of the pitch, but then I think teams deserve a longer one for really cynical play near the try line.

Another frustration is when a team gets a penalty deep in their own half and are clearly winding up for a box kick but the ref plays advantage, they should just blow straight away in most cases.
OTT
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2368
Joined: February 2nd, 2012, 4:19 pm
Location: Blackrock

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by OTT »

I hate when a penalty try is given and the ref also gives a yellow card as well. There were a few examples over the last two weekends of it off mauls, in the South Africa vs Arg match the Boks got two penalty try’s where the maul was brought down and two yellow cards were doled out, it ended the Argies chances. It’s cynical so give the PT no problem with that at all but it just feels like a double punishment to give a yellow as well.

They are also doing it on quick taps where guys would be in for try’s but are tackled before the 10 and get the pt and yellow card given against them. I think it happened us (Leinster) down in South Africa last season in one of the matches, we gave away the pt and lost a player for most of the rest of the game making it almost impossible to get back into it.

The punishment is the pt the yellow is just way to harsh for me, especially the way a lot of other things get officiated.
"Horrocks went one way, Taylor the other and I was left holding the bloody hyphen!"

~The Late Great Mick English
User avatar
riocard911
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5969
Joined: July 27th, 2015, 10:42 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by riocard911 »

OTT wrote: September 26th, 2022, 11:32 am I hate when a penalty try is given and the ref also gives a yellow card as well. There were a few examples over the last two weekends of it off mauls, in the South Africa vs Arg match the Boks got two penalty try’s where the maul was brought down and two yellow cards were doled out, it ended the Argies chances. It’s cynical so give the PT no problem with that at all but it just feels like a double punishment to give a yellow as well.

They are also doing it on quick taps where guys would be in for try’s but are tackled before the 10 and get the pt and yellow card given against them. I think it happened us (Leinster) down in South Africa last season in one of the matches, we gave away the pt and lost a player for most of the rest of the game making it almost impossible to get back into it.

The punishment is the pt the yellow is just way to harsh for me, especially the way a lot of other things get officiated.
On the RSA vs Arg match, I do think the yellow card for Etzebeth for pushing one of the Argentine players into his airborne team mate, causing the latter to land dangerously, was deserved. That action could have resulted in a serious injury. I can understand attackers being frustrated by illegal blocking/running lines, but that's not the ideal way to go about it.
User avatar
enby
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2126
Joined: May 20th, 2011, 3:57 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by enby »

1. Conversions. A waste of game time, just give 7 for a try.
2. Refs not enforcing the use it rule
3. Dara O'Brien
4. The hames they have made of the Heineken Cup. Bring back 6 games in the pool. Get rid of two legged knockout matches.
5. Any Welsh team
6. The haka
7. The disappearance of the drop goal other than in the last minute. I love a nice drop goal
8. Crooked put ins
9. Internationals on a Friday or Sunday
10. World Cup quarter finals
User avatar
riocard911
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5969
Joined: July 27th, 2015, 10:42 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by riocard911 »

The legalisation of the "crooked" put in at the scrum; the strike against the head, which done well was an art form in and of itself, was thereby tossed on to the slagheap of history, ochón!!!!
User avatar
Dexter
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4240
Joined: April 10th, 2010, 11:36 am

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by Dexter »

Oldschoolsocks wrote: September 22nd, 2022, 2:09 pm Good thread.

Mine are:
- Big fat teams being allowed to slow the game down
- commentators ooohing and aaahing over “linespeed” when it’s quite often offside ignored by the ref
- refs and assy refs ignoring the offside line saying it’s “not material” (it is material)
- fake tan
- Jamie George
Jaysus, that coulda been me writing that post! Every with every single one
Dont Panic!
User avatar
neiliog93
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4279
Joined: April 12th, 2008, 11:42 am

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by neiliog93 »

Not policing offside and big obese teams slowing down the game (especially South Africa) are the two biggest issues ruining the game, and incentivising/rewarding loads of kicking, while punishing teams who try to attack or play expansively, especially from inside their own half.
"This is breathless stuff.....it's on again. Contepomi out to Hickie,D'Arcy,Hickie.......................HICKIE FOR THE CORNER! THAT IS AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ruckedtobits
Rob Kearney
Posts: 8111
Joined: April 10th, 2011, 10:23 am

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by Ruckedtobits »

Daire O'Brian talking as if he understands Rugby on ATH;
Continuous pick and go attempts from inside 5 metres;
Hand flapping by scrum-halves if ball isn't 'on a plate' for them;
Yapping scrum-halves shouting for offside.
User avatar
Laighin Break
Mullet
Posts: 1829
Joined: May 3rd, 2012, 9:35 am
Location: Scandinavia

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by Laighin Break »

Ruckedtobits wrote: September 27th, 2022, 11:09 am Daire O'Brian talking as if he understands Rugby on ATH
FTFY*
*"talking" is probably optional
User avatar
Oldschoolsocks
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4929
Joined: January 4th, 2015, 10:36 am
Location: Stepping out of the Supernova

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by Oldschoolsocks »

Laighin Break wrote: September 27th, 2022, 11:26 am
Ruckedtobits wrote: September 27th, 2022, 11:09 am Daire O'Brian talking as if he understands Rugby on ATH
FTFY*
*"talking" is probably optional
This
User avatar
ronk
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15793
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 12:42 am

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by ronk »

Dexter wrote: September 26th, 2022, 4:44 pm
- Jamie George
Jaysus, that coulda been me writing that post! Every with every single one
[/quote]

Guy starts a brawl as he tries to attack a team doctor on the side of the pitch. He doesn't even get a disciplinary hearing and the Dr (and his team) are forced to issue apologies.

What happened to rugby that it would fall so far.
User avatar
paddyor
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5794
Joined: November 16th, 2012, 11:48 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by paddyor »

The TMO replays especially when a try has been scored and they play that heart thumping sound effect. The delay of game is cr@p and no amount of dramtaization will change that.
Ruddock's tackle stats consistently too low for me to be taken seriously as a Six Nations blindside..... Ruddock's defensive stats don't stack up. - All Blacks Nil, Jan 15th, 2014
England A 8 - 14 Ireland A, 25th Jan 2014
Ruddock(c) 19/2 Tackles
User avatar
LeRouxIsPHat
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15008
Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 7:49 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by LeRouxIsPHat »

ronk wrote: September 27th, 2022, 1:28 pm
Dexter wrote: September 26th, 2022, 4:44 pm
- Jamie George
Jaysus, that coulda been me writing that post! Every with every single one
Guy starts a brawl as he tries to attack a team doctor on the side of the pitch. He doesn't even get a disciplinary hearing and the Dr (and his team) are forced to issue apologies.

What happened to rugby that it would fall so far.
[/quote]

Couldn't disagree more with this, the doctor was being a pr!*k and should have known his place.

Jamie George also seems to be one of the most popular players in the world. Judging by social media he seems to go to about 90% of player weddings across the UK and Ireland :lol:
User avatar
ronk
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15793
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 12:42 am

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by ronk »

You might enjoy Trevor Brennan putting fans in their place but I hate it.

Rugby doesn't need the people watching in the hope of some thuggery.
User avatar
LeRouxIsPHat
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15008
Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 7:49 pm

Re: Rugby Pet-Hates

Post by LeRouxIsPHat »

I've never understood the idea that any sports person should have to rise above a d!%khead being a d!%khead. If they do then great, fair play to them. If they don't then I don't blame them one iota.
Post Reply