All Blacks nil wrote:Logorrhea wrote:Context context context ............... provide some or f*ck off with yourself.
Context is that our second most capped centre of all time ( an educated guess) and one half of a world record breaking international centre partnership was conditioned to look to clear out a player who had not yet been tackled (in this particular case he actually wasn't even tackled as Ruddock didn't get to him) rather than run a support line looking for an offload.
This after playing practically his whole career as a centre inside the most capped Irish player in history and the most capped centre of all time.
Context
As I said above when it gets to the stage wingers are picked chosen firstly for their recycling ability you know something is rotten.
Classy language.
k,
how about this one: Please provide the context around this very obvious quote mine. Here is a link to the article -
http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/i ... -1.2399288 - can you back up your assertion with D'Arcy's words?
Let's be very honest about this: What you have done is incredibly dishonest and is called quote mining.
I have quoted the best known example below where Young Earthers quote mine Darwin to say that he in fact does not really believe in Evolution by natural selection:
To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree.
The full quote, which truly states Darwin's position is below:
To suppose that the eye, with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree. Yet reason tells me, that if numerous gradations from a perfect and complex eye to one very imperfect and simple, each grade being useful to its possessor, can be shown to exist; if further, the eye does vary ever so slightly, and the variations be inherited, which is certainly the case; and if any variation or modification in the organ be ever useful to an animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, can hardly be considered real. How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light, hardly concerns us more than how life itself first originated; but I may remark that several facts make me suspect that any sensitive nerve may be rendered sensitive to light, and likewise to those coarser vibrations of the air which produce sound.