Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Forum for discussion of the British and Irish Lions trip to South Africa in 2009

Moderator: moderators

User avatar
LeRouxIsPHat
Cian Healy
Posts: 13484
Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 7:49 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by LeRouxIsPHat »

5-2 split on the bench and Bowe was only 50-50 to make it? hmmmm

Luke out the squad when apart from bowe there isn't much versatility in the backs, he played well last week and Williams has been rubbish all tour? hmmmmmm

Earls in good form and offers versatility but isn't picked? hmmmmmmmmmm

D'arcy brought out for no good reason and and not in the squad when the first choice centres were both injured? hmmmmmm

That selection really angers me actually and I reckon it's going to get destroyed. On the plus side I'm happy for Martyn Williams even though the game is a dead rubber.

tinker
Learner
Posts: 78
Joined: January 4th, 2008, 2:55 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by tinker »

If Morne Syeyn has missed that kick last week and this game on Saturday was to level or win the series would the management still have picked the same side??

User avatar
sarah_lennon
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15372
Joined: April 19th, 2006, 4:14 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by sarah_lennon »

We are thinking it so I'm going to say it.

I'm cheering on the Lions so that S.Jones cannot write about how if Vickery, Worsley and Flutey had played they'd have won tests 1&2
Ici, ici, c'est Dublin 4

User avatar
Mauler
Seán Cronin
Posts: 3107
Joined: February 8th, 2006, 2:04 pm
Location: Building The Wall

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by Mauler »

sarah_lennon wrote:We are thinking it so I'm going to say it.

I'm cheering on the Lions so that S.Jones cannot write about how if Vickery, Worsley and Flutey had played they'd have won tests 1&2
Dont you mean the Bokkes?
'VJ Singh hits more balls than Elton John's chin' - David Feherty

LCD_Blue
Bookworm
Posts: 169
Joined: November 10th, 2007, 4:45 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by LCD_Blue »

A joke of a selection very hard to be interested in this team. I know that SA made changes but some of our selections are unjustified by any of the tour matches. I would be worried that we could be hammered.That would be a poor end to the season for our boys.

User avatar
LeRouxIsPHat
Cian Healy
Posts: 13484
Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 7:49 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by LeRouxIsPHat »

sarah_lennon wrote:We are thinking it so I'm going to say it.

I'm cheering on the Lions so that S.Jones cannot write about how if Vickery, Worsley and Flutey had played they'd have won tests 1&2
Admittedly I read this on the planet rugby forum and there wasn't any sources to support it but apparently Peter O'Reillys match report was used in the ST thoughout the UK and Ireland and that Jones was giving out about it so fingers crossed that that's true and he'll resign and find a new career.....possibly as the British ambassador to Ireland

RichardP
Graduate
Posts: 545
Joined: March 10th, 2006, 2:45 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by RichardP »

The Boks have already built in their excuses with their joke selection. This game casts doubt on the legitimacy of the Lions to claim any sort of redemption, regardless of the result.

User avatar
ronk
Leo Cullen
Posts: 10977
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 12:42 am

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by ronk »

sarah_lennon wrote:We are thinking it so I'm going to say it.

I'm cheering on the Lions so that S.Jones cannot write about how if Vickery, Worsley and Flutey had played they'd have won tests 1&2
Vickery did play, disastrously.

I'll still be shouting for the Lions because SJ will always be an idiot but I support the Lions. We should just be glad that Heaslip is one of only 4 players to start all the tests and has been one of the stars for the Lions against the much touted Springbok backrow, possibly the best in the world.

He's now firmly established his reputation as one of the finest backrow players in the NH. According to many pundits his place was under threat from Powell :?:

User avatar
sarah_lennon
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15372
Joined: April 19th, 2006, 4:14 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by sarah_lennon »

Mauler wrote:
sarah_lennon wrote:We are thinking it so I'm going to say it.

I'm cheering on the Lions so that S.Jones cannot write about how if Vickery, Worsley and Flutey had played they'd have won tests 1&2
Dont you mean the Bokkes?
Dr Freud alive and well.

Yes Boks
Ici, ici, c'est Dublin 4

User avatar
Isaac4leinster
Mullet
Posts: 1950
Joined: January 31st, 2008, 4:34 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by Isaac4leinster »

If it wasn't a dead rubber before, the two put out by both Lions and SA have made it one. I predict it will be a messy, sh!t match

AidanSloan
Knowledgeable
Posts: 395
Joined: April 14th, 2009, 2:58 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by AidanSloan »

Isaac4leinster wrote:If it wasn't a dead rubber before, the two put out by both Lions and SA have made it one. I predict it will be a messy, sh!t match
Not so sure, there are plenty of Boks who will be hoping to make a statement for the Tri-Nations. They will also want to win the series 3-0. I think bringing in the new guys will help keep up the intensity, and it's my guess that they'll stick to a rigid game plan. It's not like a normal, end of tour Baa-Baas game where anything goes

User avatar
tones
Shane Jennings
Posts: 6130
Joined: July 21st, 2006, 5:35 pm
Location: In a glass case of Emotion

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by tones »

I can honestly say after looking at that team I'm not too bothered about Saturday. I'll watch it but not passionately, McGeechan has lost his aura in my book.
"Munster could join the French League, or an expanded English / British league."

User avatar
dipper
Knowledgeable
Posts: 382
Joined: April 14th, 2009, 10:22 pm
Location: Manila, Philippines

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by dipper »

Bizarre selection. This was a chance for the Lions to win their first test match in 8 attempts. Cheap Lions test cap being given to a few players.
Last edited by dipper on July 3rd, 2009, 12:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Clermont
Knowledgeable
Posts: 451
Joined: April 17th, 2009, 2:44 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by Clermont »

LeRouxIsPHat wrote:
sarah_lennon wrote:We are thinking it so I'm going to say it.

I'm cheering on the Lions so that S.Jones cannot write about how if Vickery, Worsley and Flutey had played they'd have won tests 1&2
Admittedly I read this on the planet rugby forum and there wasn't any sources to support it but apparently Peter O'Reillys match report was used in the ST thoughout the UK and Ireland and that Jones was giving out about it so fingers crossed that that's true and he'll resign and find a new career.....possibly as the British ambassador to Ireland
that'd be such a result, SJ is a tosser & i'd love to pick up the Sunday Times and not see his name over articles...

We all got shafted for this 3rd test, for D'Arcy & Luke to be left out is inexplicable & our country cousins can't be happy with Earls/ROG/Donkey also left out of the 22...
Victor Costello – Callsign “Burger” – Turns In His Wings: One Of You Two Jokers Is Going To Top Gun, The Other Is Flying Rubber Dogshit Out of Hong Kong

Dublinner
Bookworm
Posts: 211
Joined: November 20th, 2007, 4:48 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by Dublinner »

sarah_lennon wrote:
Mauler wrote:
sarah_lennon wrote:We are thinking it so I'm going to say it.

I'm cheering on the Lions so that S.Jones cannot write about how if Vickery, Worsley and Flutey had played they'd have won tests 1&2
Dont you mean the Bokkes?
Dr Freud alive and well.

Yes Boks
Im really dissapointed with that bizarre selection. No Luke, Tommy Bowe in the centre, Williams for Wallace. I cant understand the selection at all. Its got nothing to do with keeping the press happy.
I couldnt give two shites about what Stephen Jones thinks or says and I could not cheer for the Boks in a million years against the Lions no matter how cr@p the selection!

User avatar
Terraceman
Graduate
Posts: 516
Joined: April 13th, 2009, 6:45 pm
Location: London

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by Terraceman »

Clermont wrote: We all got shafted for this 3rd test, for D'Arcy & Luke to be left out is inexplicable & our country cousins can't be happy with Earls/ROG/Donkey also left out of the 22...
FitzGerald and DOC can feel hard done by but come on ROG?? He lost the Lions the test series, don't think even Galwey would argue for his inclusion, Keith Earls has shown some impressive form but there was just too many errors in his game to deserve a test spot.
Ah it's alright mate I've being looking to change that wing mirror- Rocky Elsom 19/05/2009

User avatar
Donny B.
Devin Toner
Posts: 26654
Joined: March 27th, 2006, 3:10 pm
Location: D12!!!!!!!!!

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by Donny B. »

Poor team selection. However it still has four Irishmen on it including two Leinstermen so I definitely wil be shouting for them. And I'd certainly never shout for those filthy, scumbag Springboks.

Oscar
Mullet
Posts: 1763
Joined: February 21st, 2006, 10:59 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by Oscar »

tinker wrote:If Morne Syeyn has missed that kick last week and this game on Saturday was to level or win the series would the management still have picked the same side??
Somebody asked the same question on PR, and this was my reply there;

"Well injuries did force 4 of the changes (props and centres), so yes we would have seen some of them no matter what.

And I think it's plain to anyone that something had to change in the backrow to legislate for Brussouw; hence bring in Nugget for deck work/continuity, and Worsley for Croft, to make up for the drop-off in power from Wallace to Williams. And the backrow changes had the knockon effect of altering the makeup of the bench, so the 5-2 split comes about, and ROG can't have any part of that bench.

So I think the only change that might not have been made is Williams for Fitz, which really is a shot in the dark and hoping against hope that Ickle can wind back the clock to 2008. I would not only have picked Fitz, Earls or D'Arcy over Williams, I would have Blair, Flutey or even Croft out of position there over him."

Adding to that, I would say that Bowe is in the best form on tour of any of the players who can cover centre, so it makes sense to play him there. He did well when he switched in the 2nd test. Flutey vs D'Arcy for his partner is a judgement call, neither have been electric so far. I would have gone for D'Arcy because the breakdown is going to be so important, but Flutey does bring a kicking dimension.

The thing this lineup does tell us is how costly the injuries have been to the team. The 22 would be so much stronger with Murray, O'Leary, Halfpenny, Ryan Jones, Flannery and Ferris in place.

User avatar
hugonaut
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5564
Joined: May 5th, 2009, 7:44 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by hugonaut »

D'arcy and Flutey didn't play well together as a centre combination against the SCK - they're both 12s and didn't play off each other or put each other into space at all, so I can see why they're not picked as a centre partnership. Bowe is a better bet at 13 than either Fitz or Earls on the evidence of the tour so far in my opinion: Earls is too slight to play against Fourie or Olivier, and Fitz hasn't shown anything at all on tour as a centre. Flutey and Bowe together will provide a physical partnership, with Flutey particularly aggressive and chippy.

Can't see why Williams is in on the wing: a thank you from the coaches for trying all the time, even though he has played like sh¡t? Luke is unlucky to be dropped, maybe they thought he'd be the target for some niggle. Don't really understand the selection. Monye obviously prefers to carry the ball in his right hand, so with Bowe moved inside, he's the best bet for the 14 jersey. He's a big physical player, and went well in the tour apart from his finishing in the first test. Hopefully he can step up to the mark this time around and leave SA on a high.

Worsley is in to bosh Saffas all day, Williams is in to counter Brussouw – both simple selections, and both deserve a chance to start a Lions test after such distinguished careers for their respective countries. Vickery has been given a chance to fight for his reputation with a better scrummaging hooker [Rees] and second row [Shaw] behind him. As I said in a previous post, if it was Vickery's height and long back that were the problem against The Beast [along with the latter's legally dubious technique], Hayes wasn't going to do any better. Vickery had played very well up until the first test, and to my mind deserves the chance to salvage his rep. If he's getting minced, just bring Hayes on.

This selection is obviously dominated by the players who can't be selected through injury - Jenkins and Murray [most people's first-choice props pre-tour], Adam Jones, Ferris, O'Driscoll and Jamie Roberts [the latter two the players of the tour on the Lions side]: when you combine that with the early losses of Flannery, O'Leary, Quinlan and Shanklin, it's easier to see why it looks like such a ram-shackle team.

User avatar
RnR
Knowledgeable
Posts: 401
Joined: January 2nd, 2007, 7:31 pm

Re: Lions Team named for 3rd Test

Post by RnR »

An odd selection in many respects. No sign of Nathan Hines? Now there's a man who would be a huge asset for us (LR).

Post Reply